<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #bcto09 on bookish communities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imaddicted.ca/ebooks/bcto09-on-bookish-communities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imaddicted.ca/ebooks/bcto09-on-bookish-communities/</link>
	<description>i'm always on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 05:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: #BCTO09 &#8211; Summary &#124; Random Musings</title>
		<link>http://imaddicted.ca/ebooks/bcto09-on-bookish-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-2569</link>
		<dc:creator>#BCTO09 &#8211; Summary &#124; Random Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 02:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaddicted.ca/?p=469#comment-2569</guid>
		<description>[...] #bcto09 on bookish communities&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #bcto09 on bookish communities&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance_</title>
		<link>http://imaddicted.ca/ebooks/bcto09-on-bookish-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>lance_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaddicted.ca/?p=469#comment-729</guid>
		<description>@Keith,

That does sound like a good idea. I wish that it was brought up in the talk.

The difference in approaches in OFPS/community editing, citizendium/wikipedia would&#039;ve added some interesting points. Community editing and feedback for non-fiction was barely talked about.

Very happy to see that Bryan&#039;s version of the feedback system is open sourced too. I&#039;ll play around with OFPS when reading the &lt;a href=&quot;http://programming-scala.labs.oreilly.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scala book&lt;/a&gt;. Looking forward to learning, and hope to see some O&#039;Reilly reps at the next bookcamp. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Keith,</p>
<p>That does sound like a good idea. I wish that it was brought up in the talk.</p>
<p>The difference in approaches in OFPS/community editing, citizendium/wikipedia would&#8217;ve added some interesting points. Community editing and feedback for non-fiction was barely talked about.</p>
<p>Very happy to see that Bryan&#8217;s version of the feedback system is open sourced too. I&#8217;ll play around with OFPS when reading the <a href="http://programming-scala.labs.oreilly.com/" rel="nofollow">Scala book</a>. Looking forward to learning, and hope to see some O&#8217;Reilly reps at the next bookcamp. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Fahlgren</title>
		<link>http://imaddicted.ca/ebooks/bcto09-on-bookish-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Fahlgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaddicted.ca/?p=469#comment-720</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;&quot;O’Reilly might be able to have community editing. It’s a nightmare for fiction.&quot;&quot;&quot;

We developed &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.oreilly.com/2009/05/collaborative-publishing-based-on-community-feedback.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OFPS&lt;/a&gt; after realizing that community *editing* and wikis were a (partial) failure. The current idea is to harness user feedback, but keep the authors in control of the actual text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;"O’Reilly might be able to have community editing. It’s a nightmare for fiction.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>We developed <a href="http://labs.oreilly.com/2009/05/collaborative-publishing-based-on-community-feedback.html" rel="nofollow">OFPS</a> after realizing that community *editing* and wikis were a (partial) failure. The current idea is to harness user feedback, but keep the authors in control of the actual text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

