<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A little more consistency on DRM and Turnitin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/</link>
	<description>i'm always on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 05:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wolever</title>
		<link>http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wolever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>@Lance: Ah, contributions to Wikipedia... I hadn&#039;t even considered that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lance: Ah, contributions to Wikipedia&#8230; I hadn&#8217;t even considered that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>@David, that&#039;s a good point. It&#039;s hard to keep a black box system fair, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2008/03/03/72165897&quot;&gt;I worry about their archival&lt;/a&gt;.

@Jonathan, another problem is see is that these court rulings rarely lead to hard and fast rules for fair use/dealing. We&#039;re not going to see a Betamax-level case for plagiarism.

My biggest problem with turnitin is that it stifles contributions from students to Wikipedia and the like. I edit articles I&#039;ve got an interested in, and that means when writing papers for school it&#039;s just more prudent to avoid these topics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David, that&#8217;s a good point. It&#8217;s hard to keep a black box system fair, and <a href="http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2008/03/03/72165897">I worry about their archival</a>.</p>
<p>@Jonathan, another problem is see is that these court rulings rarely lead to hard and fast rules for fair use/dealing. We&#8217;re not going to see a Betamax-level case for plagiarism.</p>
<p>My biggest problem with turnitin is that it stifles contributions from students to Wikipedia and the like. I edit articles I&#8217;ve got an interested in, and that means when writing papers for school it&#8217;s just more prudent to avoid these topics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>The collision is pretty much right in the backyard of fair use (or fair dealing). What we&#039;re looking at is whether or not certain uses are fair or not and you&#039;re entering into very gray territory that causes a lot of similar collisions. 

The problem is that we, as users, do not know what uses are fair or not until a court rules on it and such rulings are scarce at the moment. 

Your thought trains do indeed collide, but it&#039;s going to take years to figure out where the collision happened and what the casualties were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The collision is pretty much right in the backyard of fair use (or fair dealing). What we&#8217;re looking at is whether or not certain uses are fair or not and you&#8217;re entering into very gray territory that causes a lot of similar collisions. </p>
<p>The problem is that we, as users, do not know what uses are fair or not until a court rules on it and such rulings are scarce at the moment. </p>
<p>Your thought trains do indeed collide, but it&#8217;s going to take years to figure out where the collision happened and what the casualties were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wolever</title>
		<link>http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wolever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaddicted.ca/intellectual-property/a-little-more-consistency-on-drm-and-turnitin/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>mmm very interesting.  I&#039;d never considered that.

One way around your situation, I suppose, would be to accept that people are going to be making money off you whatever you do (at least until you get Mann-style vision that will obliterate any advertisement you come in contact with), and instead complain that there is a high risk of abuse in such an opaque system... Then you might even be able to merge the two arguments :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmm very interesting.  I&#8217;d never considered that.</p>
<p>One way around your situation, I suppose, would be to accept that people are going to be making money off you whatever you do (at least until you get Mann-style vision that will obliterate any advertisement you come in contact with), and instead complain that there is a high risk of abuse in such an opaque system&#8230; Then you might even be able to merge the two arguments :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

